Fim dos benefícios fiscais aos agrotóxicos, sustentabilidade da agricultura e a saúde no Brasil
Keywords:
Pesticides, Tax incentive, Regulation, Exemptions, externalitiesAbstract
This paper assesses the end of the tax incentives given to pesticides, based on the constitutionality analysis lawsuit (ADI 5553). Based on the last brazilian census survey (IBGE, 2017), we evaluate the tax incidence of ICMS and IPI on profitability of the agricultural establishment, in some diferent scenarios. A 15% increase in pesticide prices would have an impact on costs and profitability of approximately R$ 4 and R$ 6.8 billion (-7%), respectively. This represents a value of almost R$ 10 billion less than calculated by a similar study for a scenario of equivalent price increase. We discussed not only the impact results in income of the producer, but also the capacity of the extrafiscal function of the tax to regulate the use of pesticides and redirect possible changes in decision making on pest control methods, enabling the transition to a more sustainable and healthy agriculture. We conclude that the problem of negative externalities resulting from the use of pesticides does not end with the end of fiscal incentives to them, as they depend on the formulation of a more balanced public policy within the scope of the agricultural sector that would guarantee the defense of the population's health and sustainability.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Saúde em Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.