Fim dos benefícios fiscais aos agrotóxicos, sustentabilidade da agricultura e a saúde no Brasil

Authors

Keywords:

Pesticides, Tax incentive, Regulation, Exemptions, externalities

Abstract

This paper assesses the end of the tax incentives given to pesticides, based on the constitutionality analysis lawsuit (ADI 5553). Based on the last brazilian census survey (IBGE, 2017), we evaluate the tax incidence of ICMS and IPI on profitability of the agricultural establishment, in some diferent scenarios. A 15% increase in pesticide prices would have an impact on costs and profitability of approximately R$ 4 and R$ 6.8 billion (-7%), respectively. This represents a value of almost R$ 10 billion less than calculated by a similar study for a scenario of equivalent price increase. We discussed not only the impact results in income of the producer, but also the capacity of the extrafiscal function of the tax to regulate the use of pesticides and redirect possible changes in decision making on pest control methods, enabling the transition to a more sustainable and healthy agriculture. We conclude that the problem of negative externalities resulting from the use of pesticides does not end with the end of fiscal incentives to them, as they depend on the formulation of a more balanced public policy within the scope of the agricultural sector that would guarantee the defense of the population's health and sustainability.

Published

2022-07-04

How to Cite

1.
Soares WL, Cunha L, Firpo M. Fim dos benefícios fiscais aos agrotóxicos, sustentabilidade da agricultura e a saúde no Brasil. Saúde debate [Internet]. 2022 Jul. 4 [cited 2024 Dec. 22];46(especial 2 jun):236-48. Available from: https://saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/4648