Investigation of occupational stress and coping strategies among civil engineering professionals in the Brazilian Amazon

Authors

  • Lucas Mateus da Costa Nery Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA) – Belém (PA), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9695-8755
  • Luiz Maurício Furtado Maués Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA) – Belém (PA), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1762-8617
  • Felipe de Sá Moreira Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA) – Belém (PA), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7169-0534
  • Fernando Mählmann Heineck Universidade Estadual do Ceará (Uece) – Fortaleza (CE), Brasil.

Keywords:

Occupational stress, Coping strategies, Engineering, Occupational health, Brazil

Abstract

Occupational stress represents a considerable risk for the health and well-being of a person. The main aim of this research is to identify the most frequently occurring stressors and predictors of occupational stress in Amazon civil engineers, as well as to highlight the coping strategies employed by them. A questionnaire and a semi-structured interview were used as methods. The results showed that stress agents that usually affect civil engineers are the pressure related to job responsibility, followed by work-family conflict, where women present higher stress levels than men. Regarding coping strategies, it has been noted that the practice of physical activity was considered a common approach for senior engineers, and that social support was frequently observed among the majority of the sample. Hopefully, this research will contribute to the study of occupational stress in relation to the construction industry, as well as assist organizations and professionals in applying effective stress-coping strategies.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-05

How to Cite

1.
Nery LM da C, Maués LMF, Moreira F de S, Heineck FM. Investigation of occupational stress and coping strategies among civil engineering professionals in the Brazilian Amazon. Saúde debate [Internet]. 2025 Feb. 5 [cited 2025 Feb. 6];49(144). Available from: https://saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/9213

Issue

Section

Original Article