Evaluation studies on health promotion in primary care: A scoping review

Una Revisión de Alcance

Authors

  • Izaltina Adão Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva (PPGSC) – Florianópolis (SC), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5721-2560
  • Dais Goncalves Rocha Universidade de Brasília (UnB), Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde (FS), Departamento de Saúde Coletiva (DSC) – Brasília (DF), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1103-5930
  • Luiza Rahmeier Fietz Rios Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva (PPGSC) – Florianópolis (SC), Brasil https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2843-5159
  • Claudia Flemming Colussi Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva (PPGSC), Departamento de Saúde Pública (DSP) – Florianópolis (SC), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3395-9125

Keywords:

Health Promotion, Primary Health Care, Public Health Systems, Evaluation Studies, Scoping Review

Abstract

This study investigated health promotion evaluations of Primary Health Care (PHC) in public systems. The search was conducted across eight databases and gray literature, following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. The selection process was double-blind, with an independent analysis of titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text review. A total of 2,726 studies were identified, of which 517 were excluded due to duplication, 2,179 during the initial screening, and 22 after full-text review, resulting in the inclusion of eight articles published between 2013 and 2022, in Portuguese, English, and Spanish, from four countries. Five studies used qualitative methods, two applied mixed approaches, and one used quantitative method. The evaluations focused on specific programs, such as breastfeeding, diabetes prevention, physical activity, nutritional assistance, and oral health. The studies analyzed different dimensions: three assessed only the process, two focused on outcomes, while the others combined structure, process, and/or outcomes. The study revealed that although evaluations address structural, process, and outcome dimensions highlighting the need to strengthen individual and community capacity, the benefits of health promotion interventions vary. However, the scarcity of evaluative studies on health promotion in PHC highlights a significant knowledge gap.

Published

2025-11-10

How to Cite

1.
Adão I, Goncalves Rocha D, Rahmeier Fietz Rios L, Flemming Colussi C. Evaluation studies on health promotion in primary care: A scoping review: Una Revisión de Alcance. Saúde Debate [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 10 [cited 2026 May 2];49(147 out-dez). Available from: https://saudeemdebate.org.br/sed/article/view/10344

Data statement

  • The research data is contained in the manuscript